Board of Directors
Become a NAFCU Member
NAFCU Employment Opportunities
Together we are strong. Join NAFCU!
Watch the Video
Legislative & Regulatory Issues
Annual Privacy Disclosure Notices
CFPB's Qualified Mortgage Definition
Credit Union Tax Exemption
Defense Credit Union Issues
Housing Finance Reform
Member Business Lending
Regulatory Comment Letters
Legislative Policy Letters
Beltway Buzz Enewsletter
The Regulatory Affair Enewsletter
Grassroots Action Center
Evaluate the new proposed RBC rule's affects on your credit union with member resources.
Regulation & Compliance
Contact the Compliance Team
CFPB Mortgage Rules Compliance
Monthly Compliance Enewsletter
Quarterly BSA Enewsletter
Book of Answers
Compliance GPS Manual
NAFCU Compliance Blog
Additional Compliance Resources
Compliance Resources Search
Compliance Certification Program
Become an NCCO
Purchase or Retake Exams
Maintaining Your NCCO
Submit Non-NAFCU Programs for Credits
NCCO Program Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
NCCO Compliance Support Package for State-Chartered CUs
FinCEN Goes After Former Chief Compliance Officer for BSA Violations. Read more in the latest BSA Blast.
Data & Research
Economic & Credit Union Industry Trends
CU Industry Trends Quarterly Report
Economic and CU Research Enewsletter
Macroeconomic Data Flash Reports
NAFCU Annual Report on Credit Unions
Credit Union Federal Tax Exemption Study
Participate in Credit Union Research Surveys
Measure Your CU Financial Performance
Credit Union Capital Management Tools
CU Data & Research Publications
Economic Data & Forecast Web Links
Updated Risk-Based Capital calculator available for download.
Get it now
Education & Conferences
Strategic Growth Conference
Regulatory Compliance School
CEOs and Senior Executives Conference
Board of Directors and Supervisory Committee Conference
Annual Conference and Solutions Expo
Risk Management Seminar
Management and Leadership Institute
Regulatory Compliance Seminar
Online Training Center
Live and On-Demand Webcasts
Compliance Webcast & Online Training Subscription
Board of Directors and New Staff Online Training Subscription
Management and Leadership Series
Online Training Center All Access Pass
Certification & Training Certificates
NAFCU Certified Compliance Officer (NCCO) Program
Financial Literacy Training Certificate
BSA Training Certificate
Supervisory Committee Training Certificate
Credits for CPAs
Advertise & Exhibit
Enroll today for comprehensive CU compliance training.
About NAFCU Services
Preferred Partners A-Z
Growth and Retention
Financial and Insurance
Infrastructure and Operations
Training and Compliance
Live Webinar Schedule
NAFCU Services Blog
Become a Preferred Partner
Browse free educational resources for credit unions.
Visit the Partner Library
NAFCU urges CFPB, HUD to delay QM rules
NAFCU urges CFPB, HUD to delay QM rules
B. Dan Berger
Oct. 31, 2013 – NAFCU President and CEO Dan Berger on Wednesday
CFPB Director Richard Cordray to delay the seven significant mortgage-related rules it has scheduled to go into effect in January 2014.
Berger, in a letter, wrote, “The rules directly affect or indirectly impact every aspect of a credit union’s mortgage operations, including origination, servicing, loan originator compensation, escrow, insurance-related matters, and appraisals.” Berger emphasized that the delay must be for at least 12 months so credit unions can prepare adequately without incurring unnecessary costs.
NAFCU Senior Regulatory Affairs Counsel Tessema Tefferi also
the Department of Housing and Urban Affairs Wednesday to request that it work with CFPB to delay the implementation of both agencies’ proposed rules on qualified mortgages.
Tefferi praised HUD for proposing a rule in advance of the effective date of the CFPB’s QM rule, as many FHA loans would otherwise not qualify for the CFPB’s safe harbor treatment and would be treated as higher-priced mortgage loans. However, he urged the agency to work further with the CFPB to postpone the effective dates of both QM rules.
“As we have communicated with the CFPB, the complexity of the CFPB’s QM rule in and of itself has caused significant compliance challenges and significant costs for credit unions,” Tefferi wrote. “The challenges are compounded, however, by the fact that there are seven mortgage-related rules with which credit unions must comply by January, 2014. For credit unions, as non-profit cooperative entities that rely on retained earnings as their sole source for capital, delaying the effective dates of the rules is crucial.”
Tefferi also responded to HUD’s request for comment on whether its proposal should distinguish between safe harbor FHA loans and rebuttable presumption FHA loans: “NAFCU does not believe that it is either necessary or appropriate to make this distinction; all FHA-insured loans should be granted safe harbor protection.” Tefferi explained that a two-tiered approach would increase compliance costs for credit unions unnecessarily.
However, Tefferi also proposed an alternative interpretation of the two-tiered approach – suggesting that HUD make a threshold determined by the combination of the maximum MIP (mortgage insurance premium) and the CFPB’s annual percentage rate threshold (which requires the APR be no more than 150 basis points above the APOR, or average prime offer rate).
Tefferi also discussed how HUD’s adoption of the CFPB QM definition of “points and fees” would undermine many credit unions’ practice of pooling their resources to create Credit Union Service Organizations; the credit unions would be forced to offer their members services through more costly non-affiliates or to offer less flexibility for borrowers in using points to lower rates.
NAFCU letter to HUD
Senate Banking eyes MBS guarantee issue
52-group coalition urges alignment of QM, QRM