On January 15, 2015, the NCUA Board issued a second proposed rule regarding risk-based capital (RBC) for credit unions that amends their first risk-based capital proposal issued nearly a year prior. (Watch videos of the NCUA board RBC proposal discussion and succeeding briefing.)
Key wins and changes in the proposal are outlined below. NAFCU will be providing its members with more in-depth analysis and tools to help assess how the new proposal will impact their credit unions, including:
In addition, NCUA has provided documents about the new proposed risk-based capital rule linked to in the below "Additional Information & Resources" section of this page.
Key NAFCU victories in the new proposed rule include:
Key changes the proposal would make to NCUA's current capital requirements:
We will remain on top of this important issue and provide our members with the latest developments, analysis, tools and resources. NCUA's proposed rule on risk-based capital remains NAFCU's top regulatory priority, and we will continue to engage NCUA and Congress on this issue.
NAFCU recognizes that NCUA addressed several of the key issues, including the risk weighting and implementation period, raised by NAFCU, credit unions and lawmakers in its most recent RBC proposed rule. However, there remain several key issues with the proposed rule and NAFCU still strongly believes this rulemaking is unnecessary and will only impose more regulatory burden on an already extremely well-capitalized industry.
NAFCU believes there are several issues related to NCUA's legal authority to issue the rule asproposed, including, the ability to prescribe separate risk-based capital thresholds for well capitalized and adequately capitalized credit unions.
NAFCU is also deeply concerned with the cost of this proposal. NCUA's own estimate approximates that it will cost $3.75 million for the agency to adjust its Call Report, update its examination systems and train internal staff to implement the proposed requirements. If this proposal were to be finalized, NCUA also estimates credit unions would incur an ongoing $1.1 million expense to complete the adjusted Call Report fields. While NAFCU is still analyzing the true costs of this proposal, we strongly believe that NCUA's projections do not reflect the actual amount the agency will spend implementing the proposed changes.
Despite NCUA's claim that only a limited number of credit unions will be impacted, this proposal would force credit unions to hold hundreds of millions of dollars in additional reserves to achieve the same capital cushion levels that they currently maintain.
Ultimately, NAFCU believes legislative changes are necessary to bring about comprehensive capital reform for credit unions such as allowing credit unions to have access to supplemental capital sources, and making the statutory changes necessary to design a true risk-based capital system for credit unions.
NAFCU has outlined a legislative solution that will institute fundamental changes to the credit union regulatory capital requirements in our Five-Point Plan for Regulatory Relief. The plan, as it relates to capital reform:
After its first proposed rule regarding risk-based capital, released in January 2014, NCUA received more than 2,000 comment letters from credit unions and their trades – including NAFCU. Based on those comments, NCUA Board Chairman Debbie Matz announced that a new proposal would be released that would include a longer implementation period and revised risk weights for mortgages, investments, member business loans, credit union service organizations and corporate credit unions, among other changes.
On May 27, 2014, NAFCU submitted its official comment letter to NCUA on the agency's first proposed risk-based capital regulation. The letter explains our position in detail, including data on how the rule will gravely impair credit unions' ability to compete in the marketplace and serve their members as well as fail to provide additional safety to the industry. We firmly believe that, in this form, the proposed rule poses such widespread, catastrophic consequences that it should be withdrawn.
NAFCU has stayed at the forefront of this issue and continued to champion credit unions in major media nationwide.
NCUA Spends $150K on RBC Legal Opinion (Credit Union Times, January 30, 2015)
RBC: Legality Matters: Letter to the Editor (Credit Union Times, January 26, 2015)
Can You Hear Me Now? Why RBC Still Isn't Needed (Credit Union Journal, January 26, 2015)
More Cost, Little Benefit: Letter to the Editor (Credit Union Times, January 26, 2015)
NCUA’s RBC Would Cost $760M: NAFCU (Credit Union Times, January 23, 2015)
NAFCU: New RBC Will Cost CUs $760 Million (CUtoday.info, January 22, 2015)
NAFCU: NCUA’s Proposed Two-Tiered Approach to Risk-Based Capital Would Cost Credit Unions $760 Million
(January 22, 2015)
NAFCU Inks Fazio for RBC2 Webcast (Credit Union Times, January 21, 2015)
NAFCU: Free Webcast on RBC2 Jan. 23 with NCUA's Fazio
(January 20, 2015)
Revised RBC Reg Has Come a Long Way, But Some Say Still Not Far Enough (Credit Union Journal, January 16, 2015)
Eliminated RBC Provision May Still Impact Exams: Onsite Coverage (January 15, 2015)
CUNA, NAFCU united on NCUA's RBC2 Proposal (January 15, 2015)
NAFCU Statement On NCUA's Second Proposal on Risk-Based Capital (January 15, 2015)
The Great Risk-Based Capital Debate, Part II (Credit Union Journal, January 9, 2015)
NAFCU Statement on NCUA Board's Upcoming Second Risk-Based Capital Proposal
(January 8, 2015)
See all of NAFCU's media outreach.
REGULATORY ALERT: 15-EA-02: NCUA - RBC2 (member-only) – Download NAFCU's summary of the new proposed risk-based capital rule and send comments via survey by April 3, 2015.
View series of Risk-Based Capital posts
Letters to NCUA
Updated January 2015