Newsroom
March 17, 2017
NAFCU to DoL: Exempt CUs from fiduciary rule
NAFCU fully supports the 60-day delay in implementation of the Labor Department's fiduciary duty rule and on Friday urged the department to revoke the rule or, at the very least, exempt credit unions.
NAFCU Regulatory Affairs Counsel Andrew Morris, in an official comment letter, said that the Labor Department's final rule defining who is a fiduciary of an employee benefit plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code should be rescinded because its complex requirements would discourage investment recommendations and restrict consumer choice.
The Labor Department recently announced a proposed 60-day delay of its fiduciary rule implementation date to June 9.
"Credit unions are different than most other types of financial institutions. Since the Great Depression, the credit union industry has defined itself as 'not for profit, not for charity, but for service,' and that shared philosophy has endured to this day," Morris wrote. "As financial cooperatives directed by volunteer boards, credit unions exist for the primary purpose of serving their membership – not for earning fees on investment brokerage."
Morris pointed out that the NCUA has traditionally stated that federal credit unions "may not act as brokers-dealers in securities or provide investment advice of the type that would render them 'investment advisers.'" While the Labor Department's rule covers these types of activities, it is also covers other transactions and relationships that "unfairly burden credit union activity with complex requirements and potential litigation risk."
As a result, he wrote, credit unions may decide that it is no longer worthwhile to recommend an investment advisory credit union service organization to a member or to make certain investment recommendations related to rollovers or transfers.
He added that the fiduciary rule's Best Interest Contract Exemption would impose a costly burden on credit unions since they would need to adopt anti-conflict policies before engaging in certain advisory activity.
"NAFCU believes that there is little merit in requiring credit unions to comply with a complex fiduciary duty requirement when there is minimal, if any, data indicating that potential conflicts of interest have negatively impacted credit union member service," he concluded.
NAFCU Regulatory Affairs Counsel Andrew Morris, in an official comment letter, said that the Labor Department's final rule defining who is a fiduciary of an employee benefit plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code should be rescinded because its complex requirements would discourage investment recommendations and restrict consumer choice.
The Labor Department recently announced a proposed 60-day delay of its fiduciary rule implementation date to June 9.
"Credit unions are different than most other types of financial institutions. Since the Great Depression, the credit union industry has defined itself as 'not for profit, not for charity, but for service,' and that shared philosophy has endured to this day," Morris wrote. "As financial cooperatives directed by volunteer boards, credit unions exist for the primary purpose of serving their membership – not for earning fees on investment brokerage."
Morris pointed out that the NCUA has traditionally stated that federal credit unions "may not act as brokers-dealers in securities or provide investment advice of the type that would render them 'investment advisers.'" While the Labor Department's rule covers these types of activities, it is also covers other transactions and relationships that "unfairly burden credit union activity with complex requirements and potential litigation risk."
As a result, he wrote, credit unions may decide that it is no longer worthwhile to recommend an investment advisory credit union service organization to a member or to make certain investment recommendations related to rollovers or transfers.
He added that the fiduciary rule's Best Interest Contract Exemption would impose a costly burden on credit unions since they would need to adopt anti-conflict policies before engaging in certain advisory activity.
"NAFCU believes that there is little merit in requiring credit unions to comply with a complex fiduciary duty requirement when there is minimal, if any, data indicating that potential conflicts of interest have negatively impacted credit union member service," he concluded.
Share This
Related Resources
The Bottom Line on Insurance Tracking and Collateral Protection
Strategy
preferred partner
Allied Solutions
Blog Post
Resiliency In Your Incident Response Plan
Cybersecurity
preferred partner
DefenseStorm
Blog Post
Add to Calendar 2024-04-15 09:00:00 2024-04-15 09:00:00 Mergers and Acquisitions: Unifying Two Different Executive Total Compensation and Benefits Programs Listen On: Key Takeaways: [03:50] With the merger of a smaller credit union into a larger one you are really only dealing with integrating staff into the larger credit union. [05:53] When working with a merger of equals we start with a deep dive into the executive compensation and benefits of each organization. [09:09] If your current executive benefits provider doesn’t conduct regular plan evaluations, consider having a plan audit anyway. [13:46] Don’t overpay for these things if you don’t have to. When you have more options available that means the cost is more appropriate. [17:11] It is in a unified organization’s best interest to do tier timelines where we look at your top executives who are critical to the unified organization’s success today and then slowly add in the next levels. Web NAFCU digital@nafcu.org America/New_York public
Mergers and Acquisitions: Unifying Two Different Executive Total Compensation and Benefits Programs
preferred partner
Gallagher
Podcast
Add to Calendar 2024-04-11 14:00:00 2024-04-11 14:00:00 Regulation E: Impacts Across Your Institution Dive into regulatory excellence with, Regulation E: Impacts Across Your Institution. This webinar is tailored to empower you with the knowledge and strategies necessary to effectively implement the Electronic Funds Transfer Act (EFTA) and Regulation E within your operations. You’ll explore how to apply Regulation E across various business areas to ensure compliance obligations are met with precision. Key Takeaways Learn the basics of EFTA and Regulation E Understand how to apply Regulation E at your organization to detect processes and transactions that require Regulation E compliance Discover how Regulation E may apply to a large breath of areas in your institutions and functions for which you may rely on third-party vendors Review recent enforcement activity for non-compliance with EFTA and Regulation E Register Now $295 Members | $395 Nonmembers(Additional $50 for USB)One registration gives your entire team access to the live webinar and on-demand recording until April 11, 2025Go to the Online Training Center to access the webinar after purchase » Who Should Attend NCCOs NCRMs Compliance and risk titles Education Credits NCCOs will receive 1.0 CEUs for participating in this webinar NCRMs will recieve 1.0 CEUs for participating in this webinar Web NAFCU digital@nafcu.org America/New_York public
Regulation E: Impacts Across Your Institution
Credits: NCCO, NCRM
Webinar
Get daily updates.
Subscribe to NAFCU today.