Newsroom
June 27, 2014
2 views on recess appointment ruling and CFPB
June 30, 2014 – A key House member and CFPB's general counsel offered different views last week on the impact on CFPB of a Supreme Court ruling declaring invalid the president's "recess appointments" of three National Labor Relations Board members.
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, issued a statement that the actions CFPB Director Richard Cordray took during his 18-month recess appointment – he was later confirmed to his post – are now in question, The Wall Street Journal reported. However, CFPB's general counsel issued a statement that CFPB wasn't part of the NLRB case and that the court's ruling makes no mention of the bureau of Cordray. The Hill also reported that Cordray, following his confirmation, affirmed his previous actions.
The high court said the NLRB appointments were not proper because they were not made when the Senate was in a recess period lasting at least 10 days. The Senate, at the time, separated its pro forma sessions by three-day periods.
Cordray, while first seated in a recess appointment, was confirmed by the full Senate in July 2013.
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, issued a statement that the actions CFPB Director Richard Cordray took during his 18-month recess appointment – he was later confirmed to his post – are now in question, The Wall Street Journal reported. However, CFPB's general counsel issued a statement that CFPB wasn't part of the NLRB case and that the court's ruling makes no mention of the bureau of Cordray. The Hill also reported that Cordray, following his confirmation, affirmed his previous actions.
The high court said the NLRB appointments were not proper because they were not made when the Senate was in a recess period lasting at least 10 days. The Senate, at the time, separated its pro forma sessions by three-day periods.
Cordray, while first seated in a recess appointment, was confirmed by the full Senate in July 2013.
Share This
Related Resources
Add to Calendar 2024-04-23 14:00:00 2024-04-23 14:00:00 Monitoring the Latest Litigation Risks Credit unions’ operations pose litigation risks, with more of these cases being filed as class action lawsuits. In this Monitoring the Latest Litigation Risks for Credit Unions webinar, you’ll review some of the specific kinds of lawsuits impacting credit unions and what potential claims could be on the horizon. You’ll also examine some options for mitigating risks. Key Takeaways Review the current lawsuit trends. Understand the potential claims risks Explore options for mitigating risks. Register Now $295 Members | $395 Nonmembers(Additional $50 for USB)One registration gives your entire team access to the live webinar and on-demand recording until April 23, 2025Go to the Online Training Center to access the webinar after purchase » Who Should Attend NCCOs NCRMs Compliance and risk titles Education Credits NCRMs will recieve 1.0 CEUs for participating in this webinar NCCOs will recieve 1.0 CEUs for participating in this webinar Web NAFCU digital@nafcu.org America/New_York public
Monitoring the Latest Litigation Risks
Credits: NCCO, NCRM
Webinar
The Bottom Line on Insurance Tracking and Collateral Protection
Strategy
preferred partner
Allied Solutions
Blog Post
Resiliency In Your Incident Response Plan
Cybersecurity
preferred partner
DefenseStorm
Blog Post
Add to Calendar 2024-04-15 09:00:00 2024-04-15 09:00:00 Mergers and Acquisitions: Unifying Two Different Executive Total Compensation and Benefits Programs Listen On: Key Takeaways: [03:50] With the merger of a smaller credit union into a larger one you are really only dealing with integrating staff into the larger credit union. [05:53] When working with a merger of equals we start with a deep dive into the executive compensation and benefits of each organization. [09:09] If your current executive benefits provider doesn’t conduct regular plan evaluations, consider having a plan audit anyway. [13:46] Don’t overpay for these things if you don’t have to. When you have more options available that means the cost is more appropriate. [17:11] It is in a unified organization’s best interest to do tier timelines where we look at your top executives who are critical to the unified organization’s success today and then slowly add in the next levels. Web NAFCU digital@nafcu.org America/New_York public
Mergers and Acquisitions: Unifying Two Different Executive Total Compensation and Benefits Programs
preferred partner
Gallagher
Podcast
Get daily updates.
Subscribe to NAFCU today.