Newsroom
August 24, 2014
Mystery shoppers pan banks' overdraft info
Aug. 6, 2014 – A group of consumer advocacy groups sent "mystery shoppers" to 39 bank branches to test the accuracy of information given to consumers about overdraft products and services, and found that the information was inconsistent and often incorrect.
The organizations – the California Reinvestment Coalition, the New Economy Project, Reinvestment Partners and the Woodstock Institute – conducted 64 visits at branches located in Chicago, Durham, N.C., Oakland, Calif., and New York City.
The overall findings, according to the resulting study, were that banks across the board provided explanations of overdraft programs that varied from branch to branch and employee to employee – resulting in unclear and incorrect information. The mystery shoppers found that employees did not make clear how overdraft fees were triggered, or how the opt-in requirement for ATM and debit courtesy overdraft works. The study also found that branches in predominantly non-white neighborhoods had longer wait times and fewer employees available to help customers.
As a result of the study findings, the groups made recommendations to CFPB and banking regulators, including that they ban overdraft fees at ATMs and for debit-card transactions.
CFPB listed overdraft regulation as being in the "prerule stage" in its Spring 2014 regulatory agenda and has indicated that possible areas of concern include opt-in processes, fee structures and transaction posting order.
A NAFCU Economic & CU Monitor survey last year found that 98 percent of survey respondents charge overdraft fees, with a median fee of $25. However, 94 percent of these will reverse charges on a case-by-case basis, and nearly 70 percent of respondents contact members who repeatedly incur overdraft charges.
The organizations – the California Reinvestment Coalition, the New Economy Project, Reinvestment Partners and the Woodstock Institute – conducted 64 visits at branches located in Chicago, Durham, N.C., Oakland, Calif., and New York City.
The overall findings, according to the resulting study, were that banks across the board provided explanations of overdraft programs that varied from branch to branch and employee to employee – resulting in unclear and incorrect information. The mystery shoppers found that employees did not make clear how overdraft fees were triggered, or how the opt-in requirement for ATM and debit courtesy overdraft works. The study also found that branches in predominantly non-white neighborhoods had longer wait times and fewer employees available to help customers.
As a result of the study findings, the groups made recommendations to CFPB and banking regulators, including that they ban overdraft fees at ATMs and for debit-card transactions.
CFPB listed overdraft regulation as being in the "prerule stage" in its Spring 2014 regulatory agenda and has indicated that possible areas of concern include opt-in processes, fee structures and transaction posting order.
A NAFCU Economic & CU Monitor survey last year found that 98 percent of survey respondents charge overdraft fees, with a median fee of $25. However, 94 percent of these will reverse charges on a case-by-case basis, and nearly 70 percent of respondents contact members who repeatedly incur overdraft charges.
Share This
Related Resources
Add to Calendar 2024-05-03 14:00:00 2024-05-03 14:00:00 Plan Sponsor Attitudes Toward Retirement Plan Management and Fiduciary Outsourcing About the Webinar In January 2024, Pentegra conducted a survey of retirement plan sponsors and their perspectives on retirement plan management and fiduciary outsourcing. The survey measured how sponsors are using fiduciary outsourcing to help better manage their retirement plans. It also captured their perspectives on what outsourcing does to help them better position their plans and drive improved retirement plan outcomes. Key Takeaways: What is the full scope of your responsibilities as a plan sponsor? What is fiduciary outsourcing and how does it work? How does fiduciary outsourcing help reduce workloads and minimize risk? How can a credit union best position its plan to drive improved outcomes? Register Here Web NAFCU digital@nafcu.org America/New_York public
Plan Sponsor Attitudes Toward Retirement Plan Management and Fiduciary Outsourcing
preferred partner
Pentegra
Webinar
Turning Lemons into Lemonade: Capitalizing in a Post-Banking Crisis Era
Strategy
preferred partner
Allied Solutions
Blog Post
Ensuring Safety and Soundness with AI
Management, Consumer Lending, FinTech
preferred partner
Upstart
Blog Post
Add to Calendar 2024-05-02 14:00:00 2024-05-02 14:00:00 Mastering Resilience in Incident Response Plans About the Webinar An Incident Response (IR) plan is crucial for guiding credit unions through major incidents efficiently and effectively. However, many IR plans lack resilience, making them less adaptable to the evolving threat landscape. Join us for our webinar Mastering Resilience in Incident Response Plans where DefenseStorm cyber experts Elizabeth Houser and James Bruhl will delve into the importance of resiliency within cybersecurity IR plans. Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn how to: Ensure IR plan accessibility so that all team members with assigned roles are prepared for effective incident response. Conduct efficient and regular reviews to ensure roles and responsibilities are current, tools are relevant, and compliance requirements are met. Implement and utilize tabletops to regularly test the effectiveness of your IR plan. Enhance preparedness, efficiency, and confidence among responders. View On-Demand Web NAFCU digital@nafcu.org America/New_York public
Mastering Resilience in Incident Response Plans
preferred partner
DefenseStorm
Webinar
Get daily updates.
Subscribe to NAFCU today.