Newsroom
May 22, 2015
Proposed Target-MasterCard settlement falls through
A $19 million proposed settlement between Target and MasterCard failed to go through because the deal did not receive 90 percent participation rate from MasterCard-issuing banks – a stipulation required by Target.
"Credit unions deserve to be fully compensated for their losses that were no fault of their own," said NAFCU Senior Vice President of Government Affairs and General Counsel Carrie Hunt. "The failure to opt in to the settlement by financial institutions sends a strong signal to card companies that the current reimbursement system does not work and financial institutions need to be made whole."
The settlement was contingent on, among other things, issuers representing at least 90 percent of the eligible MasterCard accounts accepting their alternative recovery offers, either directly or through their sponsoring issuers, by May 20. CU Times reported Thursday that it obtained communications sent Thursday from MasterCard to a financial services provider saying that the threshold was not met. The ABA Banking Journal also reported the deal has failed, as did Nasdaq.com, American Banker,ABCnews.com, StarTribune and other news publications.
Financial institutions' class counsel had protested that MasterCard's settlement with Target left their clients – three banks and one credit union – out of the negotiations, saying Target "was trying to hijack the class action and use MasterCard to foist a cheap deal on banks beholden to the credit card company," according to Reuters. Because the class had not been certified, however, Target's counsel said the negotiations were fair.
CU Times quoted Karl Cambronne of Chestnut Cambronne, who is one of the attorneys representing Umpqua Bank, Mutual Bank, Village Bank, CSE Federal Credit Union and First Federal Savings of Lorain, which are fighting the settlement, who said this news should be an "encouraging event for banks."
Cambronne told CU Times that the parties are scheduled to appear in court tomorrow to determine the next steps.
"Credit unions deserve to be fully compensated for their losses that were no fault of their own," said NAFCU Senior Vice President of Government Affairs and General Counsel Carrie Hunt. "The failure to opt in to the settlement by financial institutions sends a strong signal to card companies that the current reimbursement system does not work and financial institutions need to be made whole."
The settlement was contingent on, among other things, issuers representing at least 90 percent of the eligible MasterCard accounts accepting their alternative recovery offers, either directly or through their sponsoring issuers, by May 20. CU Times reported Thursday that it obtained communications sent Thursday from MasterCard to a financial services provider saying that the threshold was not met. The ABA Banking Journal also reported the deal has failed, as did Nasdaq.com, American Banker,ABCnews.com, StarTribune and other news publications.
Financial institutions' class counsel had protested that MasterCard's settlement with Target left their clients – three banks and one credit union – out of the negotiations, saying Target "was trying to hijack the class action and use MasterCard to foist a cheap deal on banks beholden to the credit card company," according to Reuters. Because the class had not been certified, however, Target's counsel said the negotiations were fair.
CU Times quoted Karl Cambronne of Chestnut Cambronne, who is one of the attorneys representing Umpqua Bank, Mutual Bank, Village Bank, CSE Federal Credit Union and First Federal Savings of Lorain, which are fighting the settlement, who said this news should be an "encouraging event for banks."
Cambronne told CU Times that the parties are scheduled to appear in court tomorrow to determine the next steps.
Share This
Related Resources
Add to Calendar 2024-06-26 14:00:00 2024-06-26 14:00:00 Gallagher Executive Compensation and Benefits Survey About the Webinar The webinar will share trends in executive pay increases, annual bonuses, and nonqualified benefit plans. Learn how to use the data charts as well as make this data actionable in order to improve your retention strategy. You’ll hear directly from the survey project manager on how to maximize the data points to gain a competitive edge in the market. Key findings on: Total compensation by asset size Nonqualified benefit plans Bonus targets and metrics Prerequisites Demographics Board expenses Watch On-Demand Web NAFCU digital@nafcu.org America/New_York public
Gallagher Executive Compensation and Benefits Survey
preferred partner
Gallagher
Webinar
Add to Calendar 2024-06-21 09:00:00 2024-06-21 09:00:00 The Evolving Role of the CISO in Credit Unions Listen On: Key Takeaways: [01:30] Being able to properly implement risk management decisions, especially in the cyber age we live in, is incredibly important so CISOs have a lot of challenges here. [02:27] Having a leader who can really communicate cyber risks and understand how ready that institution is to deal with cyber events is incredibly important. [05:36] We need to be talking about risk openly. We need to be documenting and really understanding what remediating risk looks like and how you do that strategically. [16:38] Governance, risk, compliance, and adherence to regulatory controls are all being looked at much more closely. You are also seeing other technology that is coming into the fold directly responsible for helping CISOs navigate those waters. [18:28] The reaction from the governing bodies is directly related to the needs of the position. They’re trying to help make sure that we are positioned in a way that gets us the most possibility of success, maturing our postures and protecting the institutions. Web NAFCU digital@nafcu.org America/New_York public
The Evolving Role of the CISO in Credit Unions
preferred partner
DefenseStorm
Podcast
AI in Action: Redefining Disaster Preparedness and Financial Security
Strategy
preferred partner
Allied Solutions
Blog Post
Get daily updates.
Subscribe to NAFCU today.