Newsroom
June 01, 2015
High court blocks 'strip-off' of junior liens in bankruptcy
Borrowers whose homes' values are fully underwater cannot "strip off" or void a junior lien when filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the Supreme Court has ruled, 9-0.
A home-equity loan can be a "junior lien," taken out after a first mortgage and using a home as collateral.
The decision was announced Monday. In the case (Bank of America v. Caulket), two borrowers each had two mortgages on their homes; Bank of America held the junior liens. Both borrowers were underwater and filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection two years ago. The borrowers wanted to "strip off" the junior mortgages, or drop those debts.
In its ruling, the court cited a decision from a prior case (Dewsnup v. Timm), finding that lenders still have a secured claim "regardless of whether the value of that property would be sufficient to cover the claim."
NAFCU Regulatory Counsel Kavitha Subramanian, who analyzed Monday's decision, said the court reversed a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit and it affirms protection for commercial lenders in a Chapter 7 proceeding for all mortgage debt owed regardless of the value of the underlying home.
The court found that a "secured claim" is one supported by a security interest in property, regardless of whether the value of that property would be sufficient to cover the claim, Subramanian said.
"Thus, even if the value of the property was not sufficient to cover the senior lien on the mortgage, the Bankruptcy Court is not permitted to void – or ‘strip off' – the junior mortgage liens; the junior lien is still a secured interest in the property," she said.
The court argued that allowing a lender's secured status to be contingent on the underlying value of the property could result in wildly different results in a bankruptcy proceeding and could impact credit availability in the market.
A home-equity loan can be a "junior lien," taken out after a first mortgage and using a home as collateral.
The decision was announced Monday. In the case (Bank of America v. Caulket), two borrowers each had two mortgages on their homes; Bank of America held the junior liens. Both borrowers were underwater and filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection two years ago. The borrowers wanted to "strip off" the junior mortgages, or drop those debts.
In its ruling, the court cited a decision from a prior case (Dewsnup v. Timm), finding that lenders still have a secured claim "regardless of whether the value of that property would be sufficient to cover the claim."
NAFCU Regulatory Counsel Kavitha Subramanian, who analyzed Monday's decision, said the court reversed a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit and it affirms protection for commercial lenders in a Chapter 7 proceeding for all mortgage debt owed regardless of the value of the underlying home.
The court found that a "secured claim" is one supported by a security interest in property, regardless of whether the value of that property would be sufficient to cover the claim, Subramanian said.
"Thus, even if the value of the property was not sufficient to cover the senior lien on the mortgage, the Bankruptcy Court is not permitted to void – or ‘strip off' – the junior mortgage liens; the junior lien is still a secured interest in the property," she said.
The court argued that allowing a lender's secured status to be contingent on the underlying value of the property could result in wildly different results in a bankruptcy proceeding and could impact credit availability in the market.
Share This
Related Resources
Add to Calendar 2024-05-06 14:00:00 2024-05-06 14:00:00 Overview of Regulation CC Join us for this webinar, Overview of Regulation CC, and you’ll delve into the intricacies of the Expedited Funds Availability Act and Regulation CC. This includes gaining invaluable insights on effectively implementing funds availability requirements, navigating the process of placing holds on deposited items and crafting comprehensive disclosures for your members. Don't miss this opportunity to enhance your understanding of regulatory compliance in the financial landscape. Key Takeaways Know the funds availability requirements Learn what must be included in disclosures Comprehend extended holds Register Now $295 Members | $395 Nonmembers(Additional $50 for USB)One registration gives your entire team access to the live webinar and on-demand recording until April 18, 2025Go to the Online Training Center to access the webinar after purchase » Who Should Attend NCCOs NCRMs Compliance and risk titles Education Credits NCCOs will receive 1.0 CEUs for participating in this webinar NCRMs will recieve 1.0 CEUs for participating in this webinar Web NAFCU digital@nafcu.org America/New_York public
Overview of Regulation CC
Credits: NCCO, NCRM
Webinar
Add to Calendar 2024-05-03 14:00:00 2024-05-03 14:00:00 Plan Sponsor Attitudes Toward Retirement Plan Management and Fiduciary Outsourcing About the Webinar In January 2024, Pentegra conducted a survey of retirement plan sponsors and their perspectives on retirement plan management and fiduciary outsourcing. The survey measured how sponsors are using fiduciary outsourcing to help better manage their retirement plans. It also captured their perspectives on what outsourcing does to help them better position their plans and drive improved retirement plan outcomes. Key Takeaways: What is the full scope of your responsibilities as a plan sponsor? What is fiduciary outsourcing and how does it work? How does fiduciary outsourcing help reduce workloads and minimize risk? How can a credit union best position its plan to drive improved outcomes? Register Here Web NAFCU digital@nafcu.org America/New_York public
Plan Sponsor Attitudes Toward Retirement Plan Management and Fiduciary Outsourcing
preferred partner
Pentegra
Webinar
Turning Lemons into Lemonade: Capitalizing in a Post-Banking Crisis Era
Strategy
preferred partner
Allied Solutions
Blog Post
Add to Calendar 2024-05-03 09:00:00 2024-05-03 09:00:00 Blind Spots in the Boardroom Listen On: Key Takeaways: [04:19] For a board to change its practices first it needs to be committed to different outcomes. It takes about 30 times for a board to start to be in a new conversation before they start to get their brain rewired to embody the change [07:24] In merger conversations we lose sight of what is important for the member. We need to look at what the continuing organization will look like and what is the leadership the membership and continuing organization need and deserve. [12:39] An educated board and executive team are a sharper team. When you have sharper leaders in the organization good things come from that. [24:22] If we are not taking care of that relationship with the CEO then we are strategically hampered. With a good CEO evaluation, the board is higher performing, the CEO is more attentive to being high performing, and the relationship is high performing and more genitive. Web NAFCU digital@nafcu.org America/New_York public
Blind Spots in the Boardroom
preferred partner
DDJ Myers
Podcast
Get daily updates.
Subscribe to NAFCU today.