Risk-Based Capital Rule
In August 2018, the NCUA proposed amendments to the 2015 risk-based capital rule, including changes to the definition of a complex credit union and a delay of the effective date by one year, to January 1, 2020. The proposal amends the definition of a “complex” credit union for risk-based capital purposes by increasing the threshold level for coverage from $100 million to $500 million. At the NCUA Board’s October 2018 meeting, Chairman McWatters and Board Member Metsger voted to finalize the rule. NAFCU thanked the NCUA Board for revisiting the rule, but emphasized that statutory changes are required to provide credit unions with a modern capital regime, and that the risk-based capital rule should be significantly revised or withdrawn prior to its implementation date (full comments here).
On April 8, 2019, Rodney Hood and Todd Harper were sworn into the NCUA Board, and Hood was named Chairman. McWatters remains on as a Board Member. There is potential for the new NCUA Board to revisit the RBC rule, especially given concerns with the impact the current expected credit loss (CECL) standard will have on the industry. NAFCU will continue to advocate for a further delay of the risk-based capital rule, as well as modifications.
On the legislative side, bipartisan legislation to delay the effective date of the risk-based capital rule to January 1, 2021 passed in the House of Representatives three times in 2018 as part of larger packages. For example, it passed as part of the FY 2019 Financial Services and General Government appropriations measure. It was also a part of the House amendments to S. 488, the JOBS and Investor Confidence Act of 2018, which passed the House 406-4. NAFCU continues to lobby Congress for a further delay, and listed the request as a priority for 2019 (see NAFCU’s letter to the House and Senate).
In February 2017, the NCUA issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) on alternative capital (you can read NAFCU’s Regulatory Alert on the ANPR here). The ANPR included discussion of both supplemental capital and secondary capital. NAFCU supports a proposed supplemental capital framework so long as it does not conflict with the mutual, cooperative structure of credit unions. You can read NAFCU’s full comments here.
The NCUA’s Fall 2018 rulemaking agenda indicated that the agency planned to issue an alternative capital proposed rule in December 2018. Although the proposal is still forthcoming, NAFCU expects a proposed rule in 2019.
Capital Planning and Stress Testing
On April 25, 2018, the NCUA published a final rule amending Part 702 of its regulations to provide covered credit unions (i.e., those with $10 billion or more in total assets) with a more flexible framework for meeting capital planning and stress testing requirements as they grow. NAFCU has prepared a Final Regulation that analyzes the new rule.
While the final rule’s tiered regulatory approach provides some flexibility for credit unions just crossing the $10 billion asset threshold, it is fundamentally limiting – particularly for the largest credit unions. NAFCU believes that capital planning requirements should not only be tailored based on the complexity and financial condition of covered credit unions, but also contextualized in terms of overall industry risk.